Pages

Saturday, October 23, 2010

Thoughts on Lamb: The Gospel According to Biff, Christ's Childhood Pal

So it shall be read, and so it shall be written.  I just finished Christopher Moore's "Lamb".  It was glorious, divine, and strangely erotic ;) It may sound like this book is just one big heresy waiting to happen, but it wasn't.  It was well-poised and philosophical and in no way demeaning to faith. 


Our story starts in Heaven.  Biff, Jesus (or as he is known in the book, Joshua)'s best friend from ye olde days of the bible is brought back to life to write the "true" story of Christ.  Biff is stranded on earth with his dumb angel Bodyguard, Raziel to write his gospel. And so Biff, the inventor of sarcasm and the original propagator of the prolific joke "so... two Jews walk into a bar...", starts off on Josh's childhood adventure. 

What is gained by this gospel?  It portrays Joshua as a unique, sometimes doubtful and always inquisitive young man.  Biff is the cynic (and wildly sexually promiscuous) and Josh is forever the believer (and perpetually celibate).  Yet the two harmoniously tackle magicians, emotional attachment to yeti, meditation and the study of both Yoga and Buddhism (not at the same time...).  Simultaneously, you are laughing, learning and eventually (and inevitably) cringing at Joshua's final death and rebirth. 

Honestly, I needed a good laugh, and this book is laugh-out-loud funny.  The Bible has always been portrayed to me as this weighty tome whose language and subject matter is almost impenetrable.  "Lamb" was quite the contrary.  It was completely accessible and, as I mentioned before, tread the thin line between disrespect and worship with ease. 

Oh yeah, and Joshua says Fuck a lot.  Awesome.  And eats Bacon.  Also awesome.

If you're not a big reader, but want to pick up something you know that you will enjoy and finish, I thoroughly recommend this book.  It is engaging and altogether a hilarious, saucy little caprice that will knock your socks off.  9 stars out of 10.

ET

Sunday, October 17, 2010

Thoughts on: We So Seldom Look on Love by Barbara Gowdy

This weekend I had the pleasure of finishing a collection of short stories by Barbara Gowdy called "We So Seldom Look on Love". 



I've never read anything by Gowdy before, but I do remember buying this book.  It came highly recommended to me by a friend.   In university, I harboured a strange fascination (and obsession) with what I placed under the idea of the Carnivalesque (Bakhtin-style).  I watched Freaks often, at least once a month.  I read Geek Love by Katherine Dunn and thought it was a brillant masterpiece of real human drama.  I was obsessed with Rabelais and did all kinds of weird research on side shows and travelling circuses.   Weird, I guess, but also completely fascinating.  This book tickled the same spot that found all of that interesting. 

In "We So Seldom Look on Love", Gowdy explores, in a series of short stories, little pockets of freakishness.  Each story focuses on one character whose life is changed by some profound physical affectation.  Mothers with the skin of a lizard.  A Necrophiliac whose heart is broken by cadavers.  A man who kills his second head.  A woman who grew up with a second set of legs named Sue. Her prose is very normal, matter of fact.  By normal, I don't mean not that good, not that bad.  I mean, it's not extreme or lush or visceral.  It deliberately tells a commonplace story in the most plain language possible.  This lends itself well to stories about life in small town america, and the stories are told in a very human, poignant and expressive way.  Preconceptions about marriage, familial relationships, surgeries, and even sexual identities are calmly and precisely challenged. 

Altogether, I found the book uncomfortable in a pleasant way.  I have another Gowdy book in the collection and I'm looking forward to cracking it open some time down the road.  I have the feeling that settling into a Gowdy book will always feel like I'm patting myself on the back.

Wednesday, October 13, 2010

Thoughts on Scaramouche by Rafael Sabatini

Another one bites the dust, to quote a famous Queen song.  Another famous Queen lyric, "Scaramouche, Scaramouche, can you do the Fandango?".  Thus, a not so subtle segue into my most recent read, Rafael Sabatini's "Scaramouche" (1921).  Full of political intrigue, sword fights and sword-fighting politicians (isn't redundancy redundant?), "Scaramouche" was an interesting period piece and had one of the best opening lines I have ever read: "He was born with a gift of laughter and a sense that the world was mad".  



It was a rollicking journey that began in the French countryside at the beginning of the French Revolution.  In walks our not so heroic hero, Andre-Louis Moreau.  He is the most unlikeable, cowardly, hypocritical and yet oddly intriguing protagonist I've had the pleasure to go on an adventure with.  After the murder of his best friend at the hands of a protector of the Privileged (M. de la Tour d'Azur), Moreau goes on a rampage, inciting revolutionary riots and causing general menace.  Eventually, he settles in with an acting troupe and on goes his journey of revenge.  There is a GREAT ending, and a solid romance that subtly intertwines itself with Moreau's more human qualities. 

Recently, I finished helping a friend produce a piece of theatre that included segments from Commedia dell'arte charactures so the Theatre scenes were really thrilling for me.  For those unfamiliar, this is a form of Italian Improv that surrounds the use of character masks.  Each mask denotes (and the characters have evolved and changed over time) a certain personality, name and set of characteristics.  Take for example, Dotorei, the bumbling Doctor who is brilliant, loves science and often misses the point.  Or Arrlechino, the harlot who ends up getting the better of everyone with her shenanigans.  Scaramouche is one such character, and Andre-Louis Moreau's character is defined by Scaramouche's characteristics.  Not only does he play Scaramouche on the stage, but he lives his life with the sardonic wit, devious plotting and the ability to get out of any sticky situation.  Endlessly adaptable, the character of Scaramouche gives a new dimension and narrative frame to the book.  A character within a character. 

Also, did I mention the sword-fighting?  and the Frenchness (although Sabatini was born in Italy and raised in England I believe)?  I ended up putting on "Fan Fan la Tulipe| and making lentil salad just to capture the mood.  Le sigh.

Oh, and there is a great movie adaptation, if you like that kind of thing.  Which I do.

Thanks for reading.  I'm sure to read another book soon so keep checking back.  Ta for now.

Sunday, October 3, 2010

Thoughts on: The Human Stain by Philip Roth

This morning as I slowly came to life, I finished reading "The Human Stain" by prolific American writer Philip Roth.

I've never read anything by Roth before, but I must say that reading this book was a wholly delightful experience.  Every word, scene and character is hand crafted in such a way that you are pulled into the far-reaching narrative as soon as the light turns green.  The result is a multi-faceted, sharp and profound plot that focuses on a cast of players that are as real and human as a next-door neighbour. 

The story begins with Coleman Silk, the Dean of Athena University.  His life has slowly been falling apart.  First, he is forced to resign from teaching under suspicion of racism.  During roll call of one of his classes, he comes across the same two students who never attend the class.  So he calls out "Does anyone know these people?  Do they exist or are they spooks?".  It turns out the two students whom were always absent were African Americans, and when they heard the comment, took it to be an archaic racial slur and mounted an offensive against him.  Slowly he is pushed from the university, the tides change, his wife dies from a stroke and all that rage and loneliness wells up inside of Coleman Silk.  He begins writing a book called Spooks, in the belief that it will prove that the university killed his wife.

In comes our narrator, Nathan Zuckerman.  He is a neighbour of Coleman who comes into his life abruptly one day, raving about the book, the murder of his wife and asking Zuckerman to help him with the writing.  Slowly Zuckerman befriends Coleman and in so doing discovers both the great person and the great secrets that have surrounded his life.  What ensues is a historical, lively and character-focused account of not only Silk's life, but those that came in contact with him by blood or bond.

Coleman is a compelling character, as is Zuckerman but Roth does not stop there.  Whether you are reading about Les Farley (PTSD afflicted Vietnam War Veteran, angry, failed dairy farmer and incredibly courageous and self-searching) or Delphine Roux (Parisian born, beautiful, petite and highly intellectual Athena professor who both hates and strangely loves Coleman Silk despite her better judgement), Roth brings each sliver of each person to life through his unique writing style.  You aren't just reading an overarching narrative when you read this book.  You slip into their minds, from character to character, until each slice of life, each painstakingly simple scene has fully come to realization. 

I loved it, beginning to end.  That being said, it was DENSE and took me a long time.  Never once did I feel that I was slogging, instead, I felt as if I was savouring.  On the addition of the book that I read, the front cover has a quote that reads "In American literature today, there's Philip Roth, and then there's everybody else" - Chicago Tribune.  Huge words, and I'm not well read enough to in any way ratify the statement.  However, it was an awesome (in the actual sense of the word) piece of literature, and one that will continue to develop in my mind for years to come.